RebeccaChan1126 · 5 Oct 2025, 06:29 UTC
Actual pad contact and mounting. Compare the physical pads with the intended pair. A bag label is not enough. Also look underneath the tray at its locating contacts.
5 pointsOne pocket or all of them? Don't average away that difference
11 pointsWe've watched the near row most because it's easiest to see. So I don't know about all pockets. Pads were replaced recently, but the first correction was earlier than that.
22 pointsWho identified the replacement pads? A stores issue record may tell you what was supplied without proving what is now fitted.
6 pointsThe old correction matters too. Even a wrong replacement pad would only explain the later behaviour. Keep those program versions for the setup review.
10 pointsCompare the same identified puck at agreed positions, once the maintainer has checked the assembly. I mean a controlled comparison, not three people picking whatever is closest
-1 pointsYes. Near row was convenient, not representative
23 pointsJane, stores supplied the correct reference but maintenance hasn't identified the fitted pair yet. Nina, the three versions are saved. Oliver, I'll ask for the comparison across the tray after that physical check.
19 pointsAre the old pads still available? They could show what contact changed, even if they are no longer suitable for use.
19 pointsYes, in the removed-parts box. I'll keep them there for maintenance. Glad we didn't bin them just because the new packet had the right number on it.
13 pointsCheck the puck condition as part of that comparison too. A seating change or damaged contact face should not get buried under the pad discussion
15 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .