I can't rank the UR5e demo against a different spacer tray

NadiaArcher0378 · 22 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC

Reply to discussion
NA
NadiaArcher0378
Both tray-transfer demonstrations look promising, but one starts with a tidy tray and the other with our awkward workshop tray. I'm considering UR5e alongside other candidates for fifteen molded spacers. I need to compare the actual job, not reward whichever video starts after more preparation.

16 replies

AL
AlexCell
Replying to NadiaArcher0378

Which incoming tray condition does your ordinary work produce, and what accepted output must each candidate deliver?

9 points
JA
JaneBaker0510
Replying to AlexCell

Include the work before the tray reaches that starting condition

4 points
TH
ThomasArcher0364
Replying to JaneBaker0510

Does either existing video show who prepared its tray, or would that still be a question for the supplier?

7 points
NA
NadiaArcher0378
Replying to ThomasArcher0364

Our workshop tray is the normal input. The tidy video's preparation is off camera; the other shows a person rearranging two spacers before the transfer. I cannot price either from the arm movement alone.

8 points
TO
TobyArcher0405
Replying to NadiaArcher0378

Can the rearrangement time be recovered from the second video without guessing?

10 points
AL
AlexCell
Replying to TobyArcher0405

Useful for describing that demonstration, but would it represent normal preparation? I would request the same complete task boundaries from both before turning a clip duration into a cost estimate.

6 points
JA
JaneBaker0510
Replying to AlexCell

Yes, a visible intervention is evidence it happened, not its usual frequency

24 points
TH
ThomasArcher0364
Replying to JaneBaker0510

And ask whether the two rearranged spacers were ordinary incoming variation or a deliberately difficult example, since both tell you something different about the offered process.

3 points
NA
NadiaArcher0378
Replying to ThomasArcher0364

The demonstrator's note calls them ordinary input. I have retained that attribution, not promoted two spacers into a failure rate. Both suppliers now have the same incoming and finished-tray description.

19 points
TO
TobyArcher0405
Replying to NadiaArcher0378

Are you requiring identical tooling, or equivalent responsibility for the whole transfer?

8 points
AL
AlexCell
Replying to TobyArcher0405

Equivalent task responsibility. Different tooling may be the point of comparing candidates; it needs its own preparation, changeover and support work included, not excluded to make the arm footage look comparable.

25 points
JA
JaneBaker0510
Replying to AlexCell

And somebody must own any new tray the proposed method requires

22 points
TH
ThomasArcher0364
Replying to JaneBaker0510

Has Nadia actually been offered a new tray yet, Jane, or are you identifying a condition for a future proposal?

0 points
JA
JaneBaker0510
Replying to ThomasArcher0364

Future condition. No new-tray offer established here; I should have made that explicit

15 points
NA
NadiaArcher0378
Replying to JaneBaker0510

No new tray offered. I've withdrawn my provisional ranking and annotated what each existing clip establishes. The revised common-task request is out, with responses pending; we have not run another comparison in these two days.

19 points
TO
TobyArcher0405
Replying to NadiaArcher0378

Please return with the preparation answer; that is what these videos left unresolved.

10 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.