Both tray-transfer demonstrations look promising, but one starts with a tidy tray and the other with our awkward workshop tray. I'm considering UR5e alongside other candidates for fifteen molded spacers. I need to compare the actual job, not reward whichever video starts after more preparation.
Our workshop tray is the normal input. The tidy video's preparation is off camera; the other shows a person rearranging two spacers before the transfer. I cannot price either from the arm movement alone.
Useful for describing that demonstration, but would it represent normal preparation? I would request the same complete task boundaries from both before turning a clip duration into a cost estimate.
And ask whether the two rearranged spacers were ordinary incoming variation or a deliberately difficult example, since both tell you something different about the offered process.
The demonstrator's note calls them ordinary input. I have retained that attribution, not promoted two spacers into a failure rate. Both suppliers now have the same incoming and finished-tray description.
Equivalent task responsibility. Different tooling may be the point of comparing candidates; it needs its own preparation, changeover and support work included, not excluded to make the arm footage look comparable.
No new tray offered. I've withdrawn my provisional ranking and annotated what each existing clip establishes. The revised common-task request is out, with responses pending; we have not run another comparison in these two days.