They used different tool orientations. Neither drawing states which is intended for loading.

Then have the integrator define the loading sequence and review the corresponding orientations, because agreeing on a tool shape alone won't resolve a pose disagreement

I've returned both drawings for a joint review. Purchasing wanted a choice today; evidence doesn't support one.

Include who approves later tooling changes in that discussion, or the agreed clearance can disappear when somebody substitutes an adapter after the order