LeahBrown0930 · 21 Jun 2026, 07:07 UTC
Start with the required bearing areas on the layer below; gaps alone don't tell me whether your cases are unsupported where it matters
23 pointsI would put the loaded tool, release and withdrawal on that same arrangement, because packaging cannot approve a support change without knowing whether the tool still has room to leave.
16 pointsWe had separate packaging and tooling views in a review. Neither person could see what the other had assumed. I would ask for one shared section through your questionable row, even if it starts as a marked-up drawing
21 pointsThe questionable row is marked now; our packaging contact says the insert carries load along two strips, but those strips aren't on the pattern drawing
20 pointsCan packing identify the strip direction on a closed case?
22 pointsLucy, that matters if orientation can change during packing; I wouldn't assume the printed face tells Leah where the insert is
17 pointsYes. I've seen that relationship vary. I mean the actual packed orientation, not artwork.
7 pointsLeah, are you being asked to approve the whole pattern now, or choose a candidate for review? I'd keep that decision visible. Otherwise a provisional row sketch can turn into the production drawing before packaging has finished
18 pointsChoose a candidate, Julia, though the email says final pattern; I have asked them to change that wording and add the bearing strips
3 pointsLucy and David's orientation point remains open, Leah; even an accurate strip drawing needs a way to relate those strips to each packed case before the proposed pattern can be assessed in use.
20 pointsAgreed; I can answer the drawing question now, but packing has not answered how they preserve that orientation
24 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.