The full-tool study is requested, but the polymer blank's grip orientation has changed since the machine opening was surveyed. Who should reconcile that change before the remaining stand position is accepted?
Who checks the changed polymer-blank grip against our FR10 access study?
MiaAdams0122 · 7 Dec 2025, 13:39 UTC
4 replies
Replying to MiaAdams0122
The integrator should combine the revised held assembly with the surveyed opening and door, with tooling and the machine owner reviewing the same candidate. Keep approach, release and withdrawal in scope. The earlier survey remains useful; the previous tool path may not.
11pointsReplying to RachelArcher0435
They have both orientations identified. Tooling proposes new fingers for the changed grip, but the first comparison still rotates the old finger outline.
5pointsReplying to MiaAdams0122
Then the new-finger candidate is incomplete. Ask for the actual proposed assembly, including adapter and connections, before treating that rotated outline as its clearance result.
19pointsReplying to RachelArcher0435
Requested. The new fingers and their withdrawal remain open items. Our setter will review the combined layout, not just the earlier machine survey.
15pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .