I'm reviewing FR10 vacuum handling for an initial ten cartons, but the supplier's smooth sample doesn't cover our incoming seams, printing and board surfaces; I need those differences assessed without quietly adding preparation work to the proposal.
I've sent examples with a seam in the proposed pickup region, heavy print and the rougher board we receive, each identified; the supplier has agreed to report by condition rather than send one successful clip.
Will the assessment include the destination release as well as pickup? I mean the actual handling task, not just holding each different surface on the bench.
And record any preparation they need. Moving a seam out of the cup area might be practical, but it is work somebody must perform, not proof the incoming orientation was fine.
Liam, no fixed orientation; Nora and Isaac, their returned trial covered transfer and release, but the seam examples needed manual turning first while the print and rough-board examples passed the agreed checks as received, so I have not accepted the full incoming range.
That leaves a specific choice to cost: an orientation-controlled method versus a tool approach that tolerates your incoming seam positions. Neither is free just because the arm can already transfer the other examples.
Keep the passing examples too. They show something useful, even though they don't rescue the seam case. I'd be annoyed if a cautious summary turned the whole trial into either works or doesn't work.