Request receipt according to the interface sheet. It says nothing about the coupon result. Both attempts used the same job label.

Any session or connection identity retained with it?

Not in the PLC entry. Python records its restart, but that marker has no matching entry on the other side.

Keep the order inside each log first. Can you find any event visible in both systems whose identity is independent of the repeated job label?

No common identified event found yet. We can order Python's two attempts internally. Cannot place the acknowledgement between them with confidence.

Keep that distinction in the report; sorting three clocks together can give an impressive-looking fiction.

Who is deciding what happens to the coupon while that result stays uncertain?

Quality owns disposition. It's held for review, no automatic repeat inspection triggered from this reconstruction.

For future records, ask for an attempt identity that survives the trip through the interface. That will not recover the missing link in this old event, so keep it unresolved.