One inspector measured the bracket while it was still clamped

AdaAdams0129 · 30 Mar 2025, 15:13 UTC

Closed
AD
AdaAdams0129
Our old UR5e proposal uses a graph of bracket dimensions that turns out to mix measurements taken in the weld fixture with measurements on the inspection bench. I only noticed because a photograph shows the clamp still closed. I would like to separate the records before deciding what they tell us about the new fixture.

11 replies

NO
NoraChen1192
Replying to AdaAdams0129

Can you identify the measurement stage for every point on that graph, or does the photograph explain only one entry?

16 points
AD
AdaAdams0129
Replying to NoraChen1192

Only that entry with certainty. Some sheets say bench, others say check OK. The spreadsheet made them all look much more comparable than the paperwork does.

18 points
NO
NoraChen1192
Replying to AdaAdams0129

Then mark the unknown stages explicitly and rebuild the comparison from entries you can actually identify; don't fill the gaps by assuming one inspector always used the same method.

16 points
EM
EmmaBennett0724
Replying to AdaAdams0129

Keep the drawing revision too. Are all those brackets even the same variant?

-1 points
AD
AdaAdams0129
Replying to EmmaBennett0724

Same thickness and drawing revision, thankfully. The main confusion seems to be measurement stage, although I still need quality to confirm the bench supports used.

11 points
NO
NoraChen1192
Replying to AdaAdams0129

Were any bench readings taken after straightening? That would be another stage hidden under the same heading.

20 points
AD
AdaAdams0129
Replying to NoraChen1192

Two sheets mention correction before the final reading. I'll keep those separate. Our useful set is shrinking, but at least I can explain why.

20 points
JO
JonasChan1068
Replying to AdaAdams0129

Small honest set beats a large muddle.

13 points
NI
NinaChen1197
Replying to AdaAdams0129

You may still need a fresh trial. We lost a week trying to squeeze an answer from old records that never contained it. Ask quality what minimum new measurements would settle the fixture question.

8 points
NO
NoraChen1192
Replying to AdaAdams0129

What decision is the graph meant to support, specifically? More restraint, different locators, or simply whether the proposed process meets the drawing?

7 points
AD
AdaAdams0129
Replying to NoraChen1192

Whether to add restraint to the upright. We have withdrawn that recommendation based on this graph and asked quality and welding to define a current-part trial with identified measurement stages.

16 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .