Steel-blank tool missing from the FR10 exit view

Still provisional, Luis, but the supplier has two candidate outlines and can show both; I would rather compare those than let the tool stay an invisible point until after the arm order.

Mia's distinction is important for the handover too. A drawing based on the maintenance position could leave operators wondering why the normal setup does not match their instructions.

The setter has measured the normal opening, Mia, and it is smaller than the machine brochure view; that outline is now with both tool candidates.

Do the candidates hold the blank at the same depth?

Callum, good question. Otherwise the same gripper-centre path could carry the end of the steel blank through different space.

Different grip depths, which I had not noticed in the side views; we have asked the toolmaker to include the held blank and each proposed grip depth explicitly.

Useful. Short blank does not mean no blank.

Who is combining the toolmaker's views with the machine survey? I would avoid two suppliers checking different revisions and both reporting clear.

Felix, I'd put that with the integrator. Unless Jamie has somebody already owning the combined layout.

Our integrator owns it, Felix and Callum; their combined view rejects the deeper-grip candidate because its open fingers overlap the door edge, while the other needs a different withdrawal angle.

Does the changed angle keep the blank clear of the fixture lip as well?

And if the angle changes the approach to the next tray, include that too. Not saying it does, just don't end the check halfway out of the machine.

The revised angle clears the fixture lip in the complete-tool study, Luis; Mia, the receiving tray stays in its proposed position and the route to it is included, but the setter has flagged access to a cleaning point beside the base.

What has to get through to that cleaning point?

The setter needs space for the cleaning tool and to see the recess, not a trolley; the base outline is close enough that they want a physical layout check before agreeing.

Let them use their actual cleaning equipment in that check. A reach drawn for a hand can leave the useful tool outside the available space.

That's a worthwhile remaining question. Is the arm choice still provisional?

Yes, until the setter's access check; we have eliminated one tool candidate and found a plausible route for the other, not authorised the purchase.