We can open the main routine. The pictured call refers to a subprogram absent from the handover folder.

Ask for the dependencies and fixture assumptions together. A complete program export can still be unusable if nobody knows which reference plate, fixture revision and PLC agreement it expects. I'd use one ordinary inspection as the walkthrough.

I would bring the person who covers training sessions into that walkthrough. Let them find the revision and explain a waiting step. It is different from watching the integrator point to things on their own laptop.

Can your maintainer access the supplied files without the integrator's account?

The replacement pack opens from our maintainer account. Missing subprogram included. Fixture revision identified; signal explanations still incomplete.

Then use the incomplete signals as a handover finding, not an invitation to infer them from the code. Names such as ready and done need owners and meaning for this installed interface.

Include an interrupted inspection in the explanation too. Receiving a request, finishing it and deciding what happens to an uncertain plate are different events, and the main routine's happy path can hide all three.

Controls has described request receipt separately from inspection completion. Quality's decision for an uncertain plate remains a handover gap.

Maya, did the training-session cover find that distinction unaided in the pack? I would like to know whether the explanation survives without the controls person in the room.

Yes for receipt versus completion. No for the uncertain-plate decision, which is still undefined. Thanks Rachel for checking the reader, not only the folder.

Keep that undefined decision visible at sign-off. A complete archive is progress; it does not complete a handover whose ordinary interrupted-work case has no owner-approved disposition method.