NoraBrooks0844 · 23 Nov 2025, 10:45 UTC
Include what happens when a partial pallet is removed and returned, if that is part of your intended work. The next layer may not start above the complete layer in the drawing.
9 pointsPartials can be removed in our current dispatch method; the proposed robot method has not decided whether to retain that option or finish them elsewhere.
12 pointsThen compare both as actual proposals. Finishing elsewhere might be sensible, but it needs handling space, an assessed access method and a clear description of what dispatch receives. It is not a zero-cost exit from the support review.
3 pointsSofia, yes. And keeping a partial in place may hold up the next product. I'd show the ordinary short-order sequence rather than cost each option as if nothing follows it.
14 pointsDispatch is describing those short-order sequences for the integrator and packaging reviewer, including the next product; neither proposed method is selected.
19 pointsWho will own the operator diagram once the method is agreed? Partial positions are where a top-down picture can look clear to its author and leave somebody else counting boxes twice.
12 pointsDispatch trainer owns it with the integrator's technical review; we will use the agreed partial cases to check the draft, not copy the complete-layer picture and add a note saying finish manually.
1 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .