The FR10 loading sketch leaves the tool outside the argument

ElliotBrown0944 · 7 Sept 2025, 16:31 UTC

Closed
EL
ElliotBrown0944
Our cylindrical blank reaches the fixture in the proposal. The gripper body and open machine door are missing. I have held the arm choice while we get the actual loaded assembly into the access review.

8 replies

EL
ElenaAli0253
Replying to ElliotBrown0944

Ask for the grip depth as well as the tool shape. Otherwise the same blank can acquire rather different amounts of useful clearance between drawings.

8 points
EL
ElliotBrown0944
Replying to ElenaAli0253

Grip depth was not dimensioned. Tool supplier is adding it with the adapter and finger outline.

23 points
EL
ElenaAli0253
Replying to ElliotBrown0944

What is the proposed release like inside that fixture?

6 points
EL
ElliotBrown0944
Replying to ElenaAli0253

Blank sits against a stop between two raised jaws. Fingers need to open and withdraw above them. That part is absent from the sketch too.

10 points
EL
EllaBrooks0816
Replying to ElliotBrown0944

Keep a different finger arrangement in the comparison if the first one needs too much release space, rather than making every other part of the workshop move to accommodate it.

21 points
EL
ElenaAli0253
Replying to EllaBrooks0816

Yes, although any different fingers still need the holding and full-motion assessment. Smaller on the drawing is only one qualification for the job.

4 points
EL
ElliotBrown0944
Replying to EllaBrooks0816

Supplier is comparing two finger arrangements against the measured doorway and fixture. Neither approved. The tool review now includes release and empty withdrawal, not only entry.

15 points
HA
HanaAdams0100
Replying to ElliotBrown0944

Who changes those fingers, and can they reach the fixings in either arrangement?

16 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .