How do I check access for machine fixture loading? (Fairino FR10)

CalebBennett0754 · 18 May 2026, 08:42 UTC

Reply to discussion
CA
CalebBennett0754
We're considering Fairino FR10 for machine fixture loading with a cylindrical aluminum blank in a compact machining workshop, with 97 planned. The sketch reaches the fixture. Trouble is, we left out the gripper body and open door. I'd like to check access properly before choosing an arm

15 replies

CA
CallumBrown0882
Replying to CalebBennett0754

Got measured outlines for the opening and gripper? An offline layout might catch what the reach circle misses.

7 points
CA
CalebBennett0754
Replying to CallumBrown0882

After comparing the outlines, I found that the proposed approach overlaps the door handle even though the workpiece itself clears. That explains the misleadingly comfortable result in my initial sketch

24 points
CA
CallumBrown0882
Replying to CalebBennett0754

Use that measured layout to review the complete approach and retreat offline. Include the tool, cables and service access, then ask the integrator to assess a revised mounting arrangement.

3 points
CA
CalebBennett0754
Replying to CallumBrown0882

@CallumBrown0882 Our buyer says go bigger. Does that help, or just buy the same problem in a larger arm?

11 points
CA
CallumBrown0882
Replying to CalebBennett0754

@CalebBennett0754 Going larger should open up mounting options. It might be the most straightforward option to explore.

14 points
KA
KaiBarnes0541
Replying to CallumBrown0882

@CallumBrown0882 A different arm geometry may introduce its own clearance problems. Increasing reach doesn't establish that the proposed tool can pass the existing handle obstruction.

7 points
CA
CallumBrown0882
Replying to KaiBarnes0541

@KaiBarnes0541 Yes, I made that sound more certain than it's. Compare candidate geometry in the measured layout; a larger arm is only useful if the complete approach improves.

8 points
PA
PavelAdams0092
Replying to CallumBrown0882

@CallumBrown0882 On our separate machine job, the first pedestal position blocked a maintenance panel. The transfer looked excellent until the maintenance person asked how they'd open it

15 points
CA
CalebBennett0754
Replying to PavelAdams0092

Your example prompted me to compare our proposed pedestal with the service panel opening. That revealed another overlap to correct in the layout

6 points
OW
OwenBrooks0834
Replying to CalebBennett0754

@CalebBennett0754 Would making the pedestal removable address service access, or would restoring its position introduce a further setup requirement to evaluate?

15 points
CA
CallumBrown0882
Replying to OwenBrooks0834

Restoring location and checking the installation would become part of that proposal. Ask the integrator to compare it with a layout that preserves routine service access.

2 points
CA
CalebBennett0754
Replying to CallumBrown0882

Our fixture needs straight entry. Put that constraint in before moving the base around?

21 points
CA
CallumBrown0882
Replying to CalebBennett0754

@CalebBennett0754 Yes. Include the required entry direction and withdrawal conditions, not just an end pose. A reachable point can still have no usable approach with the proposed tool.

7 points
CA
CalebBennett0754
Replying to CallumBrown0882

@CallumBrown0882 Measured access review first, then an arm decision. I've settled on that route; choosing Fairino FR10 depends on a workable full-tool layout and qualified assessment

12 points
CA
CallumBrown0882
Replying to CalebBennett0754

That puts the access question in the right place in the decision. A conditional selection fits the limits of the sketch.

-1 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.