The integrator owns the combined review for our short steel-blank exchange now. The latest picture still gives the adapter an empty rectangle and leaves out the open door. I'd like those gaps answered before another arm is offered as the solution to geometry nobody has drawn.
Ask the integrator to list the missing inputs and their suppliers against that review: actual door survey, identified adapter and connections, full tool with the blank held at the proposed depth, and the setter's changeover route; the revised study should follow entry, release where required and withdrawal, not merely put more detail around the same endpoint.