Our access review changed once the adapter was included. Ask for the complete loaded tool and measured door through the route, not just the final grip position.
Cannot choose our FR5 stand from a brass-blank point alone
ChloeCarter1005 · 6 Oct 2025, 08:53 UTC
14 replies
Include the setter's fixture changeover in that review too, because a clear robot route can still leave the person carrying the fixture with nowhere useful to stand.
15 pointsRebecca, would you review that before the tool dimensions are final? I would rather eliminate an obviously awkward stand position early than wait for a perfect model.
5 pointsYes, as an early access comparison, with the unfinished dimensions visible; it should guide the design without becoming permission to build the stand.
13 pointsThe setter has already ruled out the sketch's position because it occupies the fixture trolley space, so the integrator is comparing a side position and a position farther from the opening.
9 pointsKeep the tool and machine survey tied to both alternatives. I've had proposals which were called a position comparison even though one quietly acquired longer fingers and a new price along the way. Those changes may be sensible, but they belong in the comparison.
7 pointsJasper, did the longer fingers solve the access problem in that proposal? Interested whether the extra tool length helped entry but caused trouble leaving.
2 pointsThe supplier had only checked the pickup pose when we asked. We had to request the full route before comparing it. I can't offer it as an example of longer fingers succeeding, only of an incomplete quotation.
11 pointsBoth alternatives now use the same proposed tool envelope, with its revision stated; the machine survey includes the handle and the door in its actual open position, but the loaded exit study is unfinished.
19 pointsChloe, which position does the setter prefer for reaching the fixture fixings? The trolley question may be settled without settling the rest of the changeover.
15 pointsAnd the empty return belongs in the route review. I keep seeing drawings stop once the part has reached its destination, as if the next cycle gets a new arm.
8 pointsCallum, the setter prefers the side position but has not approved it; maintenance still needs to check service access, and the integrator has both loaded exit and empty return in the remaining study.
21 pointsThat sounds like a useful preference to retain alongside the unfinished route checks, not a reason to stop comparing the farther position yet.
7 pointsThanks, Rebecca. Early rejection of the trolley clash was worthwhile even while the detailed model was incomplete.
18 pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .