Cannot choose our FR5 stand from a brass-blank point alone

ChloeCarter1005 · 6 Oct 2025, 08:53 UTC

Closed
CH
ChloeCarter1005
Our brass-blank exchange sketch reaches the fixture with an FR5, but I noticed the tool is only a grip point and the open door is absent; what should go into a useful comparison before we choose the stand location?

14 replies

OW
OwenAbbott0051
Replying to ChloeCarter1005

Our access review changed once the adapter was included. Ask for the complete loaded tool and measured door through the route, not just the final grip position.

3 points
RE
RebeccaArcher0430
Replying to ChloeCarter1005

Include the setter's fixture changeover in that review too, because a clear robot route can still leave the person carrying the fixture with nowhere useful to stand.

15 points
CA
CallumCarter0969
Replying to RebeccaArcher0430

Rebecca, would you review that before the tool dimensions are final? I would rather eliminate an obviously awkward stand position early than wait for a perfect model.

5 points
RE
RebeccaArcher0430
Replying to CallumCarter0969

Yes, as an early access comparison, with the unfinished dimensions visible; it should guide the design without becoming permission to build the stand.

13 points
CH
ChloeCarter1005
Replying to RebeccaArcher0430

The setter has already ruled out the sketch's position because it occupies the fixture trolley space, so the integrator is comparing a side position and a position farther from the opening.

9 points
JA
JasperCarter0986
Replying to ChloeCarter1005

Keep the tool and machine survey tied to both alternatives. I've had proposals which were called a position comparison even though one quietly acquired longer fingers and a new price along the way. Those changes may be sensible, but they belong in the comparison.

7 points
OW
OwenAbbott0051
Replying to JasperCarter0986

Jasper, did the longer fingers solve the access problem in that proposal? Interested whether the extra tool length helped entry but caused trouble leaving.

2 points
JA
JasperCarter0986
Replying to OwenAbbott0051

The supplier had only checked the pickup pose when we asked. We had to request the full route before comparing it. I can't offer it as an example of longer fingers succeeding, only of an incomplete quotation.

11 points
CH
ChloeCarter1005
Replying to JasperCarter0986

Both alternatives now use the same proposed tool envelope, with its revision stated; the machine survey includes the handle and the door in its actual open position, but the loaded exit study is unfinished.

19 points
CA
CallumCarter0969
Replying to ChloeCarter1005

Chloe, which position does the setter prefer for reaching the fixture fixings? The trolley question may be settled without settling the rest of the changeover.

15 points
OW
OwenAbbott0051
Replying to ChloeCarter1005

And the empty return belongs in the route review. I keep seeing drawings stop once the part has reached its destination, as if the next cycle gets a new arm.

8 points
CH
ChloeCarter1005
Replying to CallumCarter0969

Callum, the setter prefers the side position but has not approved it; maintenance still needs to check service access, and the integrator has both loaded exit and empty return in the remaining study.

21 points
RE
RebeccaArcher0430
Replying to ChloeCarter1005

That sounds like a useful preference to retain alongside the unfinished route checks, not a reason to stop comparing the farther position yet.

7 points
CA
CallumCarter0969
Replying to RebeccaArcher0430

Thanks, Rebecca. Early rejection of the trolley clash was worthwhile even while the detailed model was incomplete.

18 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .