our ur5e carton pattern leaves the internal pack supports over gaps

ElliotCarter1031 · 13 Feb 2026, 00:04 UTC

Closed
EL
ElliotCarter1031
I want the packed carton included in our UR5e layer review. The outside box looks supported, but its internal pack carries weight through two narrow strips and one crosses a gap in the turned row. The finger drawing uses that same gap for withdrawal.

5 replies

GA
GabrielBell0627
Replying to ElliotCarter1031

Give packaging a section showing those internal supports and the actual layer below. Put the full finger release on it too. An empty box sitting happily on a pallet won't answer where the packed weight goes.

14 points
EL
ElliotCarter1031
Replying to GabrielBell0627

Packaging rejected the turned row for this pack. We added a straight-row candidate with fewer cartons, and the tool supplier is checking its withdrawal against the same section.

18 points
GA
GabrielBell0627
Replying to ElliotCarter1031

Include partial orders and the first layer on the pallet. And price the lower count against real orders, not just a full pallet that nobody happens to dispatch.

4 points
EL
ElliotCarter1031
Replying to GabrielBell0627

Combined check completed with the proposed fingers and packed cartons. Straight rows meet packaging's support requirement and leave a clear release route for the assessed full and partial builds. We selected that arrangement; extra pallet handling stays in the cost.

17 points
GA
GabrielBell0627
Replying to ElliotCarter1031

Good. Make the carton construction and internal pack identity part of the purchased scope. Same outside dimensions won't protect that result if somebody changes what carries the weight inside.

16 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .