How do I show that our FR5 nest has two believable seats?

I have the same marked bracket in both photos. In one, its base reaches the bottom pads. In the other, a corner is resting on the side feature.

Can you see that corner from the loader's side? I ask because 'looks settled' can mean nobody has a view of the bit that isn't. That needs an answer even if the designer sorts the unwanted contact.

Two seats, one confident overhead photo. Not much help to the loader.

I'd send both photos in one labelled view. Separate attachments have a habit of becoming a best-case picture in the proposal and an unexplained complaint somewhere else. Make the two possible positions hard to accidentally separate.

Mia, the side feature hides the corner from the loader. Fiona, I've paired the photos and marked the contacts. Designer is checking the bracket measurements and intended clearance; no stronger clamp agreed.

Check more than the one bracket against the drawing. A useful counterexample, but the tooling decision needs to account for the permitted part variation too.

On one of our nests a single lovely sample sat perfectly and everyone blamed the next delivery. Turned out the lovely sample was the unusual one. Not saying your parts are wrong, Abigail. I'd want the designer looking at an identified spread, rather than whichever piece makes either argument easiest.

Quality has identified samples across the observed variation. The same unwanted side contact appears on more than one conforming bracket. Designer has those pieces now; the proposed relief still needs assessment.

Will the loader see a correct seat after that proposed change?

Omar's question belongs in the review of the changed nest, Abigail. A drawing that removes one interference may still leave the person loading it guessing. Let them try the proposed recognition method before calling the instruction obvious.