Checked them. The approach clips the handle; the workpiece clears. No wonder my first sketch looked so reassuring.

Start from those measurements and review approach and withdrawal offline with the full tool, cables and maintenance access included. A revised mount then needs the integrator's assessment.

@RickShift The buyer has suggested choosing a larger arm. I'm unsure whether that would address the access issue or simply increase our purchase while leaving the obstruction unresolved.

A larger arm should give you more mounting freedom, so that could be the easiest route to investigate.

@RickShift Bigger could bring another obstruction. Extra reach won't shrink the gripper past that handle.

@MinaBell0685 Yes, i made that sound more certain than it's. Compare candidate geometry in the measured layout; a larger arm is only useful if the complete approach improves.

@RickShift We had a different machine application where a good transfer layout put the pedestal across a service panel. Maintenance spotted the catch immediately.

Your example prompted me to compare our proposed pedestal with the service panel opening. That revealed another overlap to correct in the layout.

Identifying the handle obstruction has helped, but we still need an assessed layout that addresses it. We're keeping Fairino FR5 under consideration without making a purchase decision.

The obstruction is a useful finding, even with the final layout still open.