WillBarnes0574 · 14 May 2025, 02:42 UTC
Ask who owns that correction before accepting the cycle estimate. The robot can't save time on a step nobody has described yet.
11 pointsThe welding lead remembers a separate bench operation, but not whether every bracket needed it. We're looking for the travellers rather than assuming it was routine.
21 pointsAny individual part IDs on those records? A batch note may hide whether one or all needed work.
11 pointsKeep the before and after readings together if you find them. We lost sample links by renaming folders, and suddenly a very tidy record said very little.
3 pointsAnd keep the fixture revision with the readings.
11 pointsFound individual IDs on final inspection, but the correction note is batch-level. I can't attach a duration or correction to every item from what we have.
9 pointsThen show it as missing process work in the estimate. Don't average an unknown into a reassuring number.
18 pointsThe proposal now includes a process review before committing to the cycle figure. We still need to establish why the released brackets failed and what the bench work changed.
21 pointsDid anyone locate the bench tooling? Been following a similar search elsewhere; that might jog someone's memory better than the word corrected.
20 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .