Packaging has the support sketch. Tooling has only the outer carton dimensions. No combined view yet

Does the label reliably identify the contents' support direction? Ours did not, despite matching artwork.

Lucy, that is worth settling before the new drawing confidently rotates the wrong assumption; the packing process has to preserve whatever relationship the review relies on

Not established here. I've asked packing to confirm the label-to-contents relationship using actual packed cartons

Who owns the common drawing and the two reviewers' findings?

Amara, give that role to the layout integrator with packaging supplying the support requirement, rather than expecting either specialist's isolated drawing to become the complete answer.

And ask dispatch about partial orders before somebody uses the full pallet as the only permitted stopping point

Integrator owns the common revision. Dispatch is defining partial loads. Packing's orientation confirmation remains outstanding

Keep that confirmation pending explicitly. A request in the meeting notes isn't a proven packing relationship.

Will tooling show withdrawal beside already placed cartons, not just the first carton?

That sequence belongs in the same review, including its last permitted partial layer; no support or tool-access conclusion should inherit a neighbour that will not actually be present.