LuisArcher0434 · 22 Jun 2026, 03:23 UTC
Where is the blank held in the proposed fingers, Luis? I'd want that shown with the adapter and body before anyone draws the loaded approach or assumes the open fingers can leave after placement.
14 pointsOnly a blank centre point is given, with no finger geometry; I have asked the toolmaker to define the grip instead of letting the layout reviewer invent it.
2 pointsThat's the useful dependency. Will the same reviewer have the installed door position and the fixture geometry, or are machine and tool drawings going to separate people with nobody joining them?
8 pointsOur integrator owns the combined review, but the installed door position is not supplied yet; tooling has now shown the fingers and adapter with the blank held.
2 pointsThen the loaded shape is clearer but the route is still conditional. Has the integrator also scoped the open-finger withdrawal, rather than ending the study at placement?
6 pointsYes, placement, release and withdrawal are in their scope, with the complete tool load checked as well; the missing door survey prevents a firm access conclusion.
15 pointsDid the survey arrive? I'm interested in whether it changes that withdrawal, but the absence of a surveyed door doesn't prove a collision either.
8 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.