JuliaChan1109 · 11 Apr 2026, 01:22 UTC
Start by separating how the puck sits before closure from what changes during closure. Use the existing observations and have maintenance compare the actual puck, fixture contacts and complete fingers against their intended geometry before adding another correction.
8 pointsIt appears seated before closure, then turns toward the finger with the narrow contact mark.
12 pointsIs the narrow mark on the finger face, or on the puck? A photograph of both would help your maintainer.
13 pointsAre all those pickup versions retained, including the one before the first correction?
7 pointsSara, on the puck; Lucy, all versions are retained, including the original job.
9 pointsHas the same identified puck been compared with earlier accepted stock, or could the one-sided mark follow a change in the part itself?
5 pointsSara, the two surfaces are worth showing together. A contact mark can narrow the inspection, but I would not choose a replacement face from the mark alone.
19 pointsMina, retained and current pucks show the same tendency. Maintenance has the identified examples for comparison.
15 pointsDo the fitted contact faces have readable references?
11 pointsNot from the installed viewing side. Maintenance will identify them during the condition check.
13 pointsThen wrong finger is still a guess.
17 pointsWe chased a similar-looking grip by sorting every part into neat groups, and the eventual inspection found the same contact had worn across all of them; comparing stock was useful, but it took someone examining the tool to stop us inventing a separate explanation for each group.
5 pointsCondition check found matching contact references, with uneven wear on one face. Fixture contacts match their drawing.
17 pointsWhich part of that face is worn?
6 pointsThe lower curved contact is worn flatter than its drawing profile and the opposite face.
12 pointsGive the tool service person that comparison with the puck range and accumulated edits. Restoring the specified contact needs a return check of the whole transfer; it may change which of those corrections still belongs in the job.
3 pointsService has quoted restoration to the specified profile. Programmer will review the saved corrections against the restored tool.
10 pointsAnd the production plan reflects the service time?
6 pointsYes, work has been reassigned while the tool is serviced. No repaired-tool result yet.
4 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.