Fairino FR10: What should count as dimensional acceptance after welding?

AdaBrown0912 · 7 May 2026, 17:51 UTC

Reply to discussion
AD
AdaBrown0912
I'm reviewing historical records for our planned reviewing fixtures for welded mounting brackets with Fairino FR10 and a gusseted angle-bracket assembly in a welded-bracket fabrication workshop. The notes describe alignment under restraint but dimensions outside the drawing requirement after release. I'd like to distinguish incoming fit-up, fixture location and final acceptance before carrying an unexplained correction routine into the new cell; no live welding adjustments are involved.

4 replies

RE
RebeccaAllen0343
Replying to AdaBrown0912

@AdaBrown0912 Compare the specified inspection condition and reference supports with the historical sheets. Do individual measurements identify whether the assembly was restrained or released?

5 points
AD
AdaBrown0912
Replying to RebeccaAllen0343

@RebeccaAllen0343 My sheets contain both restrained and released results, with some conditions unlabelled. Although the drawing specifies the dimension, the inspection procedure doesn't clearly define the supports.

18 points
RE
RebeccaAllen0343
Replying to AdaBrown0912

@AdaBrown0912 Have quality and the drawing owner define the acceptance condition. Group the old results by known measurement state; that should make them comparable.

11 points
IS
IsaacAllen0346
Replying to RebeccaAllen0343

Grouping by restraint state won't fully establish comparability if reference supports, fixture revisions or process revisions differ or remain unknown within each group.

13 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.