HanaChan1057 · 10 Jun 2026, 14:12 UTC
Can you mark the actual support regions on the two layers, with the gripper open at release, so packaging and tooling can argue about the same gaps instead of sending you two individually tidy pictures?
18 pointsI have marked the support regions. Tooling has only supplied the closed-gripper view so far. Packaging wants filled examples before commenting on the rotated positions.
13 pointsInclude the pallet and any proposed layer sheet in that comparison as well. The support of the full arrangement may differ from two layers drawn in isolation, particularly if a sheet is being counted on to span gaps.
1 pointsNo layer sheet proposed at present. I have added the actual pallet and requested the release view. An alternative pattern is also available for packaging to compare.
0 pointsWhat changed in the alternative, Hana? Fewer cartons, different orientation or different spacing? Those would give the tool supplier quite different questions.
12 pointsFewer cartons with different spacing. Packaging is assessing filled samples. Tool supplier still needs to check the revised release and withdrawal, so neither pattern is accepted yet.
3 pointsKeep that lower carton count in the production comparison while the reviews proceed. It may be a worthwhile compromise, but the original throughput figure should not survive unchanged simply because the robot model stayed the same.
13 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.