What evidence would make these rotated FR10 cartons supportable?

FionaCarter1021 · 24 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC

Reply to discussion
FI
FionaCarter1021
My FR10 box-layer proposal repeats the rotated-over-gap problem; I need a packaging basis, not another placement-order change.

4 replies

CH
ChenCarter0964
Replying to FionaCarter1021

Use the actual filled box and pallet detail for that request. Ask packaging to show where support is required in each orientation, including the dispatch conditions. The tooling reviewer needs that same marked drawing.

20 points
FI
FionaCarter1021
Replying to ChenCarter0964

Sent both the filled-box detail and occupied tool outline. Packaging has not returned a support decision

12 points
PA
PavelChan1049
Replying to FionaCarter1021

Who owns the preferred direction in the first place? A box marking, an internal packing drawing and a warehouse stacking preference aren't interchangeable. I'd chase the person who can explain the load path, not just get a signature beside the arrow.

9 points
CH
ChenCarter0964
Replying to PavelChan1049

Pavel's distinction is worth resolving. Warehouse can explain its handling requirement, but it should not have to invent a packaging limit just because its drawing is the one everyone has.

-5 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.