How do I assess a tidy pattern with questionable support?

DanielBell0652 · 5 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC

Reply to discussion
DA
DanielBell0652
Our plan for planning alternating carton layers on a pallet with Universal Robots UR5e in a small finished-goods dispatch area has a very neat alternating layer drawing. But a sealed corrugated shipping carton has a preferred support direction, and some rotated cartons sit over gaps. I want packaging support and tool access reviewed together before I accept the pattern. Where should I start?

14 replies

TH
TheoAbbott0062
Replying to DanielBell0652

@DanielBell0652 Start by showing the carton edges that carry load and the pallet deck support on the layer drawings. Is the complete gripper outline available to overlay as well?

12 points
DA
DanielBell0652
Replying to TheoAbbott0062

We've only got top-view rectangles and a tool centre mark. The carton note specifies support direction, but the layer drawing doesn't show it.

11 points
TH
TheoAbbott0062
Replying to DanielBell0652

Build that combined drawing for packaging and your integrator. Include a repeated, unrotated layer as a simpler candidate; it may suit the support direction better.

17 points
CA
CarlaChan1097
Replying to TheoAbbott0062

@TheoAbbott0062 Don't let simpler sound like approved. An unrotated layer still needs its load and stability assessed with the actual contents.

18 points
TH
TheoAbbott0062
Replying to CarlaChan1097

@CarlaChan1097 You're right to qualify the suggestion. I intended an alternative for comparison, with both patterns requiring packaging assessment of support and stability using the specified filled cartons.

9 points
AN
AnnaBell0677
Replying to TheoAbbott0062

I thought alternating layers always made a stronger stack. Is that too simple?

4 points
TH
TheoAbbott0062
Replying to AnnaBell0677

@AnnaBell0677 Too general. The arrangement changes where loads pass through the cartons. Your packaging reviewer needs the actual construction and support geometry to judge it.

4 points
DA
DanielBell0652
Replying to TheoAbbott0062

@TheoAbbott0062 The layer overlay shows carton edges above gaps below. That gives me something specific to mark for packaging instead of saying the pattern feels wrong.

8 points
NO
NoahBrooks0803
Replying to DanielBell0652

On my dispatch setup, the top view hid the pallet deck gaps completely. Adding the deck drawing changed which positions needed packaging review.

16 points
DA
DanielBell0652
Replying to NoahBrooks0803

@NoahBrooks0803 Did you tie the pattern to a pallet specification? Ours just says pallet size, which now seems a bit thin.

4 points
NO
NoahBrooks0803
Replying to DanielBell0652

@DanielBell0652 Specify the deck arrangement as well as the footprint. Two pallets with the same outside size needn't provide the same support underneath.

15 points
TH
TheoAbbott0062
Replying to DanielBell0652

@DanielBell0652 Add the complete tool geometry and adjacent cartons at the corner positions. A tool-centre point alone can't establish whether the body or fingers overlap nearby packaging.

19 points
DA
DanielBell0652
Replying to TheoAbbott0062

I can show the pattern questions more clearly, but I can't yet say support and access both work. I'll keep the pattern decision open for the combined review.

16 points
TH
TheoAbbott0062
Replying to DanielBell0652

@DanielBell0652 The open acceptance decision follows from the two remaining requirements: the pattern must establish both support and tool access.

11 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.