I've got physical good and bad parts now, and the lip isn't hidden in the picture, so this ought to be less of a headache. It isn't. One faceplate has a faint line that quality accepts, but our draft UR5e camera exercise flags it harder than the rejected one.
I don't want to bin the accepted example just because it's awkward. Do I put it beside the reject as a comparison, or does that confuse people before we've even commissioned the cell?
Do I keep this faceplate in the reject examples or not?
MiaBennett0731 · 3 Feb 2026, 05:01 UTC
2 replies
Replying to MiaBennett0731
Keep it beside the reject. That awkward accepted part is probably your most useful example. I'd put the actual quality decision and its reason beside each image, then ask somebody to explain the difference back to you. If they can only say one line looks brighter, you've found a gap in the exercise before spending anything on the camera.
6pointsReplying to NoahBarnes0542
We used both. Turns out I'd written 'line visible' in the draft reject note, which was basically an invitation to reject both of them. Quality helped replace that with the actual finish criterion and the tutor could explain the distinction without my commentary. Keeping the annoying plate.
17pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .