Has somebody else checked the 17 blocks against the unpacked contents? Worth doing before the email gets any more entertaining.
Why are our 24 setup kits now being counted as 65 pieces?
FelixBrown0893 · 14 Oct 2025, 22:02 UTC
21 replies
Show an ordered and received count for each component, then the number of complete kits. Keep the photograph references alongside the received counts. The total loose-piece count can be shown separately, but it does not describe usable kits.
14 pointsTwo of us counted it. Seventeen blocks, no extra box. Adrian, that is the table I'm making: 24 required and 17 received on the block line, with 17 complete kits and seven incomplete sets underneath.
10 pointsAny blocks nested inside the plates or packing inserts?
3 pointsWe found small parts hidden inside a protective sleeve on one delivery, so Ella's packing question is worth answering explicitly even when the seller's arithmetic is plainly about loose pieces.
14 pointsAsk for the seven missing blocks against the confirmed kit contents. I would keep that simple request above the table. Otherwise they can reply to the arithmetic and avoid saying what they will supply.
9 pointsRetain the original invoice and final contents confirmation with the comparison. You need not rewrite the order into their new unit of measure just to explain what arrived.
5 pointsWhat did the final confirmation actually say about a kit, Felix? An explicit contents list would be more useful than a catalogue photograph with several things in it.
20 pointsIt lists one locating block, one plate and one fastener pack per kit. Ella and Sarah, we removed all inserts and checked inside the plates; nothing hidden. The sealed packaging is retained with the unpacking photos.
11 pointsKeep the 17 complete kits together in stores. Do not let the loose plates get issued as if every box is ready for a changeover. I've watched a shortage become much harder to find once the incomplete sets were spread around the shop.
18 pointsAnd tell planning that 17 are complete. This isn't the same as no usable kits, unless your particular job needs all 24 together.
15 pointsHave the fastener packs been checked for their required contents too? A correct bag count would not rule out another component shortage inside them.
12 pointsFiona, would you physically bundle them now or keep the component bins separate with an issue limit? Our setters usually prefer taking only the bits they need.
5 pointsEither can work, Naomi. I meant protect the complete-kit count from casual assumptions. On ours we bundled them because people expected a ready set; separate bins would have needed a checked picking list.
9 pointsUse the same definition of complete on the shortage table and the stores record. Physical bundling is a local choice, but changing what counts as a kit halfway through would muddy Felix's comparison again.
23 pointsPavel, fastener contents were checked during that second count and are correct. Fiona and Naomi, we will issue the 17 as complete sets and label the seven incomplete ones. They aren't needed simultaneously, Joel, so some setups can proceed.
16 pointsWho pays to send the seven blocks?
17 pointsThat belongs in the seller's fulfilment proposal, Ella. I wouldn't assume Felix has accepted another freight charge merely by asking them to complete the original order.
17 pointsSeller now offers seven blocks separately but hasn't stated dispatch timing or freight responsibility. Thanks, Theo, putting the missing-block request above the count table got a more useful reply. Nothing agreed beyond the quantity yet.
2 pointsHave that offer identify the block drawing and revision too. The count can finally be right while the supplied blocks still differ from the matched setup kits you ordered.
17 pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .