Fairino FR10 reaches on paper. What about the gripper? (machining fixture exchange)

LeoAli0188 · 1 Apr 2026, 02:40 UTC

Reply to discussion
LE
LeoAli0188
We're considering Fairino FR10 for machining fixture exchange with a rectangular polymer blank in an enclosed machining cell, with 105 planned. The sketch reaches the fixture. Trouble is, we left out the gripper body and open door. I'd like to check access properly before choosing an arm.

16 replies

LI
LinBell0618
Replying to LeoAli0188

Can you compare measured door geometry with the proposed gripper envelope? An offline layout including both may expose access issues that the reach sketch doesn't represent.

12 points
LE
LeoAli0188
Replying to LinBell0618

Checked them. The approach clips the handle; the workpiece clears. No wonder my first sketch looked so reassuring.

13 points
LI
LinBell0618
Replying to LeoAli0188

@LeoAli0188 Use that measured layout to review the complete approach and retreat offline. Include the tool, cables and service access, then ask the integrator to assess a revised mounting arrangement.

17 points
LE
LeoAli0188
Replying to LinBell0618

@LinBell0618 Our buyer says go bigger. Does that help, or just buy the same problem in a larger arm?

-2 points
LI
LinBell0618
Replying to LeoAli0188

A larger arm should give you more mounting freedom, so that could be the easiest route to investigate.

8 points
MI
MinaBell0685
Replying to LinBell0618

@LinBell0618 Bigger could bring another obstruction. Extra reach won't shrink the gripper past that handle.

13 points
LI
LinBell0618
Replying to MinaBell0685

@MinaBell0685 You're right; more mounting freedom isn't guaranteed. Check each candidate in the measured layout and only favour a larger arm if its full approach works better.

11 points
IS
IsabelArcher0387
Replying to LinBell0618

@LinBell0618 On our separate machine job, the first pedestal position blocked a maintenance panel. The transfer looked excellent until the maintenance person asked how they'd open it

11 points
LE
LeoAli0188
Replying to IsabelArcher0387

Checked ours. The suggested pedestal overlaps a panel opening too. More red pen for the drawing.

5 points
MA
MayaBarnes0562
Replying to LeoAli0188

@LeoAli0188 Could you move the pedestal for service? Or is putting it back a whole other job?

22 points
LI
LinBell0618
Replying to MayaBarnes0562

Restoring location and checking the installation would become part of that proposal. Ask the integrator to compare it with a layout that preserves routine service access.

7 points
LE
LeoAli0188
Replying to LinBell0618

Our fixture needs straight entry. Put that constraint in before moving the base around?

5 points
LI
LinBell0618
Replying to LeoAli0188

@LeoAli0188 Yes. Include the required entry direction and withdrawal conditions, not just an end pose. A reachable point can still have no usable approach with the proposed tool.

8 points
IS
IsabelArcher0387
Replying to LinBell0618

For our machine, withdrawal with a held workpiece needed a different route from entry. The empty-tool model made the clearance look much better than it was

9 points
LE
LeoAli0188
Replying to IsabelArcher0387

I've decided to base our arm selection on a measured access review. A workable layout for the complete tool and a qualified assessment will be conditions of choosing the arm.

6 points
LI
LinBell0618
Replying to LeoAli0188

Using an assessed layout as the condition gives the selection a clear basis beyond the reach sketch.

13 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.