They checked the held blank leaving the fixture. Receiving release and empty return weren't included.

Then retain that loaded check as one part of the study, but ask for the actual receiving fixture, opening fingers and complete return. And confirm the door geometry belongs to the normal working position.

Door survey confirmed. Full return now clashes with its linkage. Integrator is comparing a different route.

Does the new route keep the intended grip and full blank range? If the tool is turned differently, have the integrator check the fittings and access as well as the main body.

Same grip proposed, but the continuous revised study isn't back. No clearance claim for it yet.

Any return-path answer since, Gabriel?

And has the setter seen the revised route and stand together? A tool path can be improved while somebody else's access quietly disappears. That needs its own answer before you choose the layout.