Getting consistent inspection evidence before commissioning - presenting reflective components for surface inspection

PriyaAdams0133 · 24 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC

Reply to discussion
PR
PriyaAdams0133
We're planning presenting reflective components for surface inspection, with Fairino FR10 presenting a bright-finished enclosure faceplate to a fixed camera in a small finished-parts production cell. Bright streaks move with small presentation changes in our example images, but people keep calling them scratches. We haven't commissioned the cell. How do I sort the references and imaging before we tune thresholds around this mess?

3 replies

BE
BethChan1107
Replying to PriyaAdams0133

Were those scratches confirmed on the physical samples using your agreed appearance method? Start by linking each image to a sample and its inspection result.

12 points
PR
PriyaAdams0133
Replying to BethChan1107

Some labels came from the pictures alone. We still have the samples, but those labels aren't tied to physical inspection results. That's irritatingly circular.

20 points
BE
BethChan1107
Replying to PriyaAdams0133

@PriyaAdams0133 Keep the image-only labels uncertain pending physical inspection. A controlled comparison of lighting and presentation can then investigate whether the moving streaks indicate reflection effects.

10 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.