Our UR5e handover screenshots say complete beside the inspection request. The operator sheet calls that accepted. Nobody has included the subprogram that decides what complete means, and both documents are being handed to the next tutor as current. I want the integrator to walk us through one actual plate before this becomes another inherited mystery.
Put those two pages beside the matching installed program and have the author explain the event behind each word. Then let the next tutor follow a received result, a failed inspection and a missing result without prompting. You'll soon see whether the explanation belongs to the machine or only to the person standing beside it. Include the called routines and fixture assumptions in the handover; more photographs of the main screen won't supply those missing bits.