I am preparing references for a planned UR5e faceplate inspection. A fixed camera sees bright streaks that shift with presentation. The files call them scratches. I want to establish the physical defects and repeatable image conditions before commissioning, so students do not learn to tune around an unreliable answer sheet.
I have had an example picture outlive the explanation that made it useful. Link each picture to its physical plate and the acceptance decision. Keep uncertain examples visible as uncertain, particularly in teaching material.
Dinesh, I observed the bright area moving. I cannot yet say what lies beneath it. Victor, the labels came from a preliminary image review. I have asked the quality tutor to assess the retained plates.
The handout is flagged. The quality tutor has identified one real scratch among the moving reflections. We are keeping that plate in the comparison set. Thank you, Noah; matching the physical plate to the file avoided a muddle.
That scratched plate is the important check now. Compare whether proposed lighting reveals its mark consistently when you remove and replace it, with capture settings recorded.
And do not make the exercise only about that one scratch, Dinesh. Include accepted plates and the difficult decisions too. Otherwise the class can optimise beautifully for the specimen it already knows.