Which FR5 attempt owns this acknowledgement after the job name was reused?

MinaBrown0946 · 14 Mar 2026, 13:55 UTC

Reply to discussion
MI
MinaBrown0946
Our housing check timed out, the application restarted under the same job name, and now someone wants to attach a late acknowledgement to the newer attempt because its timestamp is closer; with Python, PLC and controller clocks disagreeing, what actually links it?

1 reply

AI
AishaBennett0779
Replying to MinaBrown0946

Look for an identity shared by the request and acknowledgement, plus source-session information; keep each log's local order intact, but if the only common detail is that reused job name, say the ownership is unresolved rather than choosing the nearest clock reading.

10 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.