Which FR5 quote includes teaching the person who covers breaks?

ImranBennett0740 · 12 Mar 2026, 11:01 UTC

Closed
IM
ImranBennett0740
I cannot compare our boxed-module packing proposals while both say training included but one describes a supplier demonstration and the other two sessions at our bench; presentation fixtures and guarding are now priced separately, and I want the handover cost equally visible.

13 replies

GA
GabrielArcher0366
Replying to ImranBennett0740

Who attends each offer, and which jobs are they meant to learn?

8points
IM
ImranBennett0740
Replying to GabrielArcher0366

The demonstration is for one visitor at the supplier; the local sessions name our operator and maintainer, but neither proposal mentions break cover or recovery after an interrupted transfer.

9points
FI
FionaAli0238
Replying to ImranBennett0740

We brought back one very enthusiastic person from a supplier visit. Then they took leave. The people left behind had photographs of a clean run and a phone number abroad. I'd want somebody less familiar with the cell included in the local handover, with time to ask awkward questions.

19points
LO
LouisChan1094
Replying to FionaAli0238

A supplier visit could still be useful for your technical lead. It just shouldn't take the place of operator training at the installed job. Ask for separate prices rather than rejecting a useful activity because it isn't the whole answer.

18points
GA
GabrielArcher0366
Replying to ImranBennett0740

Does either offer price making the instructions, or only delivering the session?

20points
HA
HanaBrooks0796
Replying to LouisChan1094

Louis is right about the visit. I'd keep it distinct, then describe the actual handover you need: operators, relief cover and maintenance, with agreed normal and interrupted cases. The supplier can price against that instead of promising training as a noun.

4points
IM
ImranBennett0740
Replying to GabrielArcher0366

Gabriel, the local offer includes job-specific instructions, while the visit offer only includes its standard guide; Hana, I have sent both suppliers the same handover scope with the visit shown as a separate option.

19points
FI
FionaAli0238
Replying to LouisChan1094

Thanks, that clears it up. I wasn't arguing against sending someone to learn from the supplier, Louis. I was arguing against expecting that person to become a complete training department on the flight home.

21points
LO
LouisChan1094
Replying to FionaAli0238

Understood. Also allow your own people's attendance time. The supplier can price a session perfectly and your total still assumes nobody has to cover the operator's normal work.

2points
IM
ImranBennett0740
Replying to LouisChan1094

Attendance and cover are now in our internal allowance, including the relief operator; the supervisor has agreed who can attend, rather than us guessing that everyone can leave the bench together.

12points
HA
HanaBrooks0796
Replying to ImranBennett0740

That's much more usable. Do the revised prices distinguish the first handover from follow-up help if the job changes? You don't need unlimited support, but you do need to know what runs out.

16points
GA
GabrielArcher0366
Replying to ImranBennett0740

Have both suppliers answered the revised scope?

20points
IM
ImranBennett0740
Replying to GabrielArcher0366

Only the local supplier has answered in full, with a defined follow-up visit and later support charged separately; the other still prices the demonstration alone, so I have left its handover cost unresolved rather than comparing the two headline totals.

5points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .