Planning for 216 without pretending every cost is known (Fairino FR5)

MayaBaker0475 · 20 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTC

Reply to discussion
MA
MayaBaker0475
The Fairino FR5 quote looked manageable for our packing tray loading cell with a packaged connector kit in a low-volume product packing room, with 216 planned. Now presentation fixtures, guarding and training are going into the estimate. I need to compare complete proposals, but some costs are still unknown. The total keeps wriggling away.

10 replies

JA
JasperChan1073
Replying to MayaBaker0475

Check who provides carton presentation in each proposal. If that responsibility differs, the headline totals may be pricing different portions of your cell.

22 points
MA
MayaBaker0475
Replying to JasperChan1073

I've found carton presentation included in one offer and assigned to us in the other. Once I account for our share, the apparent price difference reduces substantially.

4 points
JA
JasperChan1073
Replying to MayaBaker0475

@MayaBaker0475 Make a shared scope table: who supplies each item, quoted cost, and any unknown allowance. Add your internal work, then compare totals for that same scope.

14 points
MA
MayaBaker0475
Replying to JasperChan1073

Should an unknown go in as zero with a note? Otherwise I feel like I'm making up a price.

5 points
JA
JasperChan1073
Replying to MayaBaker0475

@MayaBaker0475 Use 'unpriced' and flag the total as incomplete. An allowance can be a range if you've a basis for it; zero looks like free.

8 points
AN
AnikaAdams0160
Replying to JasperChan1073

@JasperChan1073 My separate cell budget grew when we included internal work for recipe preparation and acceptance attendance. Those commitments mattered even though they weren't supplier invoice items.

6 points
MA
MayaBaker0475
Replying to AnikaAdams0160

I've checked our internal allowance and found both recipe preparation and acceptance attendance missing. Including them gives us a more complete view of the staff commitment.

9 points
JA
JasperChan1073
Replying to MayaBaker0475

@MayaBaker0475 With the responsibilities and costs aligned, you should be able to treat the lower complete total as the better-value offer.

16 points
MA
MayaBaker0475
Replying to JasperChan1073

I've settled on comparing a shared scope, including our work and visible unknowns. Any spending decision depends on filling the material gaps; the original arm totals aren't enough.

17 points
JA
JasperChan1073
Replying to MayaBaker0475

@MayaBaker0475 Using a common scope explains what the totals represent, while keeping material unknowns as conditions prevents the estimate from implying a settled commitment.

6 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.