Compare the identified sleeve before closure and in the fitted contacts. Have maintenance check the contact geometry and mountings against the intended assembly before another point edit.
Our UR5e sleeve twists against one contact during closure
HanaBennett0709 · 21 Apr 2026, 01:46 UTC
20 replies
Existing footage shows the turn begins when the left contact touches. No turn visible before that.
9 pointsHas the source seating actually been checked, or does it only look square in that camera view? Keep it in the physical comparison even if the left contact is the stronger lead.
23 pointsStatic source check completed with the identified sleeve. It reaches the intended contacts without rocking.
9 pointsDoes retained accepted stock behave like the current sleeves? A moulded part difference can meet the same finger differently, even when both examples sit happily in the source fixture.
11 pointsRetained and current accepted sleeves show the same twist. Maintenance has both groups for the tool check.
2 pointsThen compare the left and right contact identities, profiles and how they locate on the fingers. Surface wear is only one possible change in that assembly.
15 pointsMake room for the receiving check in the repair plan too. Our recent housing comparison got through the restored pickup first, with receiving still to do; a square grip isn't the whole transfer.
-2 pointsBoth contact references match the drawing. The left contact can move slightly on its mounting despite the fastener being secure.
6 pointsWhat is supposed to stop that rotation?
8 pointsA locating key behind the contact. Maintenance is checking it against the assembly drawing.
8 pointsThat is worth examining separately from the fastener. A tight screw can hold a part down without restoring the feature that fixes its orientation. I would not describe the contact as correctly fitted just because its reference matches.
18 pointsHas the key condition been confirmed? Keep the tool unavailable for this job until the service assessment settles that movement.
20 pointsKey is damaged. Service confirms it no longer locates the contact properly and is quoting the specified repair.
7 pointsDo they know what damaged it?
13 pointsNot yet. The service inspection will include the mating features, not only a replacement key.
24 pointsFair. Keep cause unknown until there is evidence. The damage explains a loose orientation, but choosing an impact story from memory could send the follow-up in the wrong direction.
22 pointsWho reviews the accumulated point edits after the repair? I'd have the saved original available, rather than ask the next programmer to reverse-engineer why each correction exists.
17 pointsOur programmer, with all saved versions. Service repair and complete transfer checks are booked into the plan.
19 pointsThen leave the current finding as damaged locating key, repair pending. The return check can decide which reviewed point set belongs with the restored assembly.
10 pointsAdd to the discussion
Welcome to Application Robot
Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.