our fr10 unload route still ends at the blank

TobyCarter1014 · 8 Dec 2025, 06:55 UTC

Closed
TO
TobyCarter1014
The lead integrator owns our combined access review and the setter is included, but the latest FR10 export still treats the rectangular blank as the whole tool. Which missing assembly information should I chase before another layout meeting?

14 replies

JA
JackBrooks0863
Replying to TobyCarter1014

Does the tooling supplier already have the complete loaded assembly drawing, Toby, or is the gripper itself still undecided? Those need different answers before the meeting.

12 points
TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to JackBrooks0863

Gripper selected. Drawing exists but omits the rear fittings. Supplier says their final orientation depends on the chosen base position, which is what we are trying to choose.

10 points
IM
ImranAli0218
Replying to TobyCarter1014

Draw the fitting alternatives, then. An empty space doesn't resolve that loop.

25 points
IS
IsabelArcher0387
Replying to TobyCarter1014

Yes, compare complete candidate arrangements against the measured opening. You can reject an obvious clash provisionally without pretending the remaining option is approved. Keep the unresolved connection space visible until the supplier defines it.

7 points
TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to ImranAli0218

I've asked for both orientations with the connected lines. The machine survey is already available, including the door handle. One earlier stand position clashes with the cabinet.

6 points
IS
IsaacBennett0781
Replying to TobyCarter1014

That's useful to know now. On ours the promising side position still needed maintenance access checked, so I would keep the setter's tasks beside the robot route when those complete options return.

13 points
JA
JackBrooks0863
Replying to IsaacBennett0781

Isaac, agreed. Toby, does your setter change this fixture routinely, or only at a major product change? The layout should show the actual task you're asking them to review.

23 points
TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to JackBrooks0863

Routine product change. The setter removes the fixture through this same opening. Their required space is marked, not yet accepted against the final tool arrangement.

12 points
IM
ImranAli0218
Replying to TobyCarter1014

Good. Marked space isn't the approval.

4 points
IS
IsabelArcher0387
Replying to TobyCarter1014

Does the route request include empty return after unloading, as well as the loaded exit? A final pickup pose and a single outward arrow would still leave half the handling unexplained.

16 points
TO
TobyCarter1014
Replying to IsabelArcher0387

Both directions are requested, including finger opening at release. The supplier has now sent the two fitting arrangements; the integrator's comparison has not happened yet.

15 points
JA
JackBrooks0863
Replying to TobyCarter1014

Keep the cabinet-conflict position with its rejection reason in the review. Otherwise it may come back later as a fresh suggestion from somebody who only sees the latest tool picture.

13 points
IS
IsaacBennett0781
Replying to TobyCarter1014

I'd like to hear whether either complete arrangement survives that review, Toby. The missing fittings can change more than the little corner they occupy.

21 points
IM
ImranAli0218
Replying to IsaacBennett0781

And check which assembly revision the result names when it comes back.

16 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .