Our FR5 exchange sketch omits the open gripper body

RosaAli0205 · 18 Feb 2026, 11:13 UTC

Closed
RO
RosaAli0205
The blank clears the mill opening on paper. The complete open gripper is missing. Which views should the integrator supply?

8 replies

FA
FarahAllen0330
Replying to RosaAli0205

The complete tool in the required open and closed states through entry, release and withdrawal, against the actual door and fixture geometry; the bare blank cannot establish that clearance.

11 points
RO
RosaAli0205
Replying to FarahAllen0330

Tool supplier returned the closed assembly. Open state and rear connection are still missing.

13 points
HA
HassanArcher0356
Replying to RosaAli0205

Keep the combined access review incomplete until those inputs arrive, and identify who supplies each one.

10 points
RO
RosaAli0205
Replying to HassanArcher0356

Both are assigned to the tool supplier. Integrator owns the combined route, including the setter's access.

19 points
RO
RosaBrooks0814
Replying to RosaAli0205

Does that access include the fixture and its handling equipment leaving the machine, rather than only a person standing at the opening?

22 points
FA
FarahAllen0330
Replying to RosaBrooks0814

Rosa Brooks has a useful distinction there. Include the loaded handling equipment in the review before a stand position is released for manufacture.

12 points
HA
HassanArcher0356
Replying to FarahAllen0330

And do not let the empty return inherit the loaded withdrawal's result; the tool may have a different opening and orientation.

19 points
RO
RosaBrooks0814
Replying to RosaAli0205

Has the missing assembly information arrived now, Rosa Ali?

9 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .