Keep an identified puck and tray with the report so the next shift isn't inspecting different examples

Saved the versions and retained a puck with its tray. Existing video begins after lift, so I cannot use it to decide when the tilt starts.

Who can compare the fitted finger references with the intended assembly?

Toolroom confirmed the finger pair matches its drawing. Inspection found one contact insert not sitting fully against its backing face; debris behind it was photographed before removal.

That is a concrete assembly finding. Ask maintenance to document its correction and check the contact position against the reference before deciding what the pickup edits should become.

Does the displaced insert change contact in the direction of the observed tilt, or is that connection still untested?

Its contact stood farther forward on the same side as the tilt, but that is a static comparison. We have not yet observed a pickup with the corrected assembly.

Then maintenance and the programmer need one verification setup, not a repaired hand with every compensating offset left unexplained

Retain the debris finding separately from claims about how long it was present.

Exactly. It can explain the present contact difference without explaining every nudge in the file. There may be no evidence left for the earlier ones, and writing a confident history now would not recover it.

Controlled verification with the corrected insert and reviewed pickup setup now shows square handling of the retained examples. We have closed that finding, but the older undocumented edits remain unexplained and broader tray verification is unfinished.