RobinAbbott0077 · 6 Feb 2026, 18:08 UTC
Neither by majority vote. What appearance check are they supposed to be using? If one person's hunting marks under a desk lamp and the other is following an agreed inspection view, that's not the same judgement.
19 pointsBoth say normal visual inspection. Their lamps and viewing positions are different. No written comparison method.
0 pointsQuality should settle the inspection method and the physical plate's decision before you make either inspector's caption the camera target. You can retain the disputed images without calling them accepted or rejected references yet.
18 pointsI would also give that particular plate an identity and somewhere to live, because a discussion about one troublesome finish becomes harder when someone returns it to the production box.
4 pointsIs it already in a training exercise?
14 pointsOnly the study folder, Anika. Plate is retained and numbered now, Amara. Quality is arranging a comparison.
21 pointsGood. You have time to leave it undecided without confusing a class or a production checker.
16 pointsOur own exercise had a genuinely accepted bright band beside a rejected lip mark. We kept both because a quiet-looking image was not enough to distinguish them. Your disputed plate may become useful even if quality accepts it.
3 pointsJamie, yes. Don't remove an awkward accepted example to make the detector look clever.
17 pointsQuality accepts the plate under the agreed viewing method. The broad streak was not a scratch.
14 pointsWhat changed between the two inspectors' methods?
21 pointsOne tilted the plate until the overhead strip light reflected along the brush direction. The other didn't.
14 pointsDoes the agreed method now explain the viewing position well enough that a replacement inspector can use it, rather than needing either of those two people to demonstrate?
18 pointsAnd keep the camera presentation separate from that physical judgement. It may need a different arrangement to reveal the required defects reliably, but it still has to respect the accepted finish.
21 pointsJamie, that's the awkward bit. Easy to hide the band and congratulate yourself while also hiding a real scratch. I'd want confirmed rejects beside this plate through the comparison.
14 pointsAmara, the method has a setup photograph and quality checked it with another inspector. They agreed on this plate.
2 pointsAdded two confirmed rejects, Beth. One disappears in our quieter camera view, so that view isn't enough. Thanks for warning me.
10 pointsAn inconvenient example doing its job, then.
23 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .