Our FR5 dashboard has more passes than accepted housings

NaomiBaker0506 · 29 Oct 2025, 06:23 UTC

Closed
NA
NaomiBaker0506
I counted the physical accepted housings and found fewer than the FR5 dashboard claims; the report adds successful retries after restart as though each were another item, while quality still needs the failed attempts kept.

11 replies

LO
LouisBell0659
Replying to NaomiBaker0506

Does every attempt carry the physical housing's identifier, or only a job label?

5 points
NA
NaomiBaker0506
Replying to LouisBell0659

Physical housing ID is present on each row, with an attempt number; the dashboard simply counts rows marked pass.

5 points
AN
AnilAbbott0027
Replying to NaomiBaker0506

Then build the accepted-item total from the agreed item disposition, while retaining the linked attempts. Don't replace the row count with any-pass-ever unless quality says that is actually the acceptance rule.

8 points
GR
GraceChan1103
Replying to NaomiBaker0506

What happens when a housing passes, then a later reviewed check fails? That will show whether the proposed total follows the decision you really use.

-6 points
NA
NadiaAli0204
Replying to AnilAbbott0027

Try that case in a rebuilt report first. Also reopen it after restart; totals should come from the stored decisions, not another round of increments.

7 points
NA
NaomiBaker0506
Replying to GraceChan1103

Quality's current disposition controls release, Grace, not any historical pass. We found one housing whose later failure was hidden by the dashboard's cheerful count.

12 points
LO
LouisBell0659
Replying to NaomiBaker0506

Who has that housing now while the count is corrected?

6 points
NA
NaomiBaker0506
Replying to LouisBell0659

Quality has it on hold; it was not dispatched, and the trial report now shows each housing once with attempts underneath and its current disposition beside it.

16 points
AN
AnilAbbott0027
Replying to NaomiBaker0506

Good that it stayed put. Does the report distinguish held from rejected? Both may be excluded from accepted quantity, but they are different things for the person arranging the next work.

4 points
NA
NadiaAli0204
Replying to AnilAbbott0027

And don't let held items fall into an automatic retry list. We just found that mistake behind a perfectly clear hold tag elsewhere.

17 points
NA
NaomiBaker0506
Replying to AnilAbbott0027

Held and rejected are separate now; reopening the offline report keeps the same total, but we still need to test later disposition changes and restart against the installed system.

2 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .