How do I assess a tidy pattern with questionable support?

JasperAllen0290 · 13 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC

Reply to discussion
JA
JasperAllen0290
I'm reviewing an alternating layer pattern for our planned arranging shipping cartons in pallet layers with Fairino FR10 in a carton palletising project. Although the drawing fits the cartons neatly, a labelled dispatch carton has a preferred support direction and some rotated positions lie above gaps. I'd like a joint review of packaging support and tool access before accepting it.

14 replies

NA
NaomiChan1115
Replying to JasperAllen0290

@JasperAllen0290 Start by showing the carton edges that carry load and the pallet deck support on the layer drawings. Is the complete gripper outline available to overlay as well?

10 points
JA
JasperAllen0290
Replying to NaomiChan1115

We've only got top-view rectangles and a tool centre mark. The carton note specifies support direction, but the layer drawing doesn't show it.

3 points
NA
NaomiChan1115
Replying to JasperAllen0290

@JasperAllen0290 Build that combined drawing for packaging and your integrator. Include a repeated, unrotated layer as a simpler candidate; it may suit the support direction better.

19 points
SO
SofiaBrooks0804
Replying to NaomiChan1115

The repeated arrangement remains a candidate, not an accepted solution. Its support and load stability still need assessment for the cartons with their actual contents.

1 points
NA
NaomiChan1115
Replying to SofiaBrooks0804

Agreed; I meant a comparison option. Packaging must assess both arrangements with the specified cartons and contents, including support and stability.

10 points
ME
MeiBarnes0603
Replying to NaomiChan1115

I thought alternating layers always made a stronger stack. Is that too simple?

-1 points
NA
NaomiChan1115
Replying to MeiBarnes0603

@MeiBarnes0603 Too general. The arrangement changes where loads pass through the cartons. Your packaging reviewer needs the actual construction and support geometry to judge it.

13 points
JA
JasperAllen0290
Replying to NaomiChan1115

The layer overlay shows carton edges above gaps below. That gives me something specific to mark for packaging instead of saying the pattern feels wrong.

14 points
CA
CarlaChen1184
Replying to JasperAllen0290

On my dispatch setup, the top view hid the pallet deck gaps completely. Adding the deck drawing changed which positions needed packaging review.

5 points
JA
JasperAllen0290
Replying to CarlaChen1184

@CarlaChen1184 Was your accepted pattern linked to a particular pallet specification? My drawing currently names only the overall pallet size.

17 points
CA
CarlaChen1184
Replying to JasperAllen0290

Specify the deck arrangement as well as the footprint. Two pallets with the same outside size needn't provide the same support underneath.

2 points
NA
NaomiChan1115
Replying to JasperAllen0290

@JasperAllen0290 For access, show the whole tool beside neighbouring cartons at the corner placements. The centre mark won't reveal body or finger overlap.

10 points
JA
JasperAllen0290
Replying to NaomiChan1115

@NaomiChan1115 I've got a useful review basis now: show support and the complete tool on the layer drawings, then have both specialists assess it. That answers my starting question; the pattern itself remains conditional on their findings.

15 points
NA
NaomiChan1115
Replying to JasperAllen0290

That gives both reviewers the same concrete arrangement to assess. Pattern acceptance can then follow their findings.

16 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.