AishaAdams0170 · 4 Sept 2025, 02:24 UTC
Through the support areas and the gaps beneath them. Use the actual packed-box orientation.
3 pointsI have requested that section. The present drawing shows the bottom layer only, so it cannot answer the rotated layer question.
17 pointsAnd include the tool's release space on the same revision.
20 pointsAsk dispatch how they take away the completed load as well, so any alternative orientation can be reviewed against their actual access and label-reading needs. Those can be easy to lose while everyone studies the box edges.
9 pointsDispatch needs one labelled face accessible from the collection side. That is now in the comparison brief alongside support and tool clearance.
10 pointsHas packaging actually reviewed the new section? I'd want their answer before people start adding interlayers because they've heard those fix pallet problems. Extra material also needs handling.
17 pointsInterlayers aren't an agreed option here yet, Omar.
17 pointsI know, Liam. I'm saying don't jump there before packaging answers. Didn't mean Aisha had proposed them. We had that extra job appear in a layout almost by magic.
17 pointsPackaging has reviewed the section and requested a different upper-layer arrangement. No interlayer proposal. Tooling is checking the alternative with dispatch's label face retained; acceptance remains open.
21 pointsDid the alternative keep enough finger withdrawal space?
17 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .