ur5e delivered fingers were not the fingers in our housing trial

JasperChen1160 · 8 Jul 2026, 01:47 UTC

Reply to discussion
JA
JasperChen1160
Our housing trial confirmed one finger set. Another arrived with the UR5e. Seven days asking for equivalence evidence, tooling still unfitted. What comparison should decide whether this substitute is usable?

5 replies

LI
LiamChan1099
Replying to JasperChen1160

Compare the identified trial and delivered assemblies against your actual housings, grip and receiving arrangement, with holding, location, surface condition and release assessed rather than inferred from a matching mounting pattern.

19 points
JA
JasperChen1160
Replying to LiamChan1099

The delivered fingers have wider tips. Tooling's dimensional comparison shows they cannot enter the required housing feature at the confirmed grip. We have rejected that arrangement for this task.

1 points
LI
LiamChan1099
Replying to JasperChen1160

Ask whether the confirmed set can actually be supplied, with its complete reference and terms, before treating the demonstrated fingers as an available replacement rather than merely evidence of the original agreement.

14 points
JA
JasperChen1160
Replying to LiamChan1099

Seller confirms the original reference is available and agrees to replace the wrong set. Return and replacement shipping details are still outstanding; neither set has moved yet.

15 points
LI
LiamChan1099
Replying to JasperChen1160

Keep those movements separate in the shortage and return records, and check the actual replacement on arrival; an agreed reference resolves the proposed remedy, not its fulfilment or the later installation checks.

8 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.