The polymer blank fits through a door we haven't drawn

Gripper supplied. Adapter still missing. I've asked who owns that drawing.

And the actual open door, including the handle. Not just a rectangle labelled opening.

Maintenance measured the door already. Integrator owns the adapter and is adding both.

Which route are they checking, loaded entry or withdrawal?

Ask for the whole transfer, including the opening fingers and return route, because clearance at the held-blank pose can hide a conflict as the tool changes shape or direction.

Rick, loaded entry first; Nora, I have added release and return to the request.

Has the fuller entry check shown a clash?

Yes, at the door handle. Integrator proposed a rotated approach or a moved base.

Our moved-base idea left no room to turn the fixture trolley. Where would yours move?

Keep both candidates provisional. The more distant base is not automatically the easier installation.

Emma, towards the tool cupboard. Setter is checking trolley access there. Rotated approach also remains under review.

Have the setter's route shown on the candidate drawing, not on a separate sketch that may use a different base position.

Did the setter get the actual trolley into that proposed space?

Yes. It cannot turn there with the proposed footprint. Moved-base candidate withdrawn.

Then the rotated approach still needs its own complete review; ruling out the other candidate does not make this one ready to install.

Agreed. Rotated approach remains provisional. Thanks, Emma. The cupboard-side option looked spacious until the trolley arrived.

Does that remaining approach use the same adapter revision?