UR5e demo using a tray we would have to refill by hand
WillArcher0400 · 15 Jan 2026, 03:09 UTC
15 replies
Compare the whole workflow if the dedicated tray is a serious option, because forcing both onto today's tray could reject a useful process change before its preparation and changeover costs are understood.
12pointsThat is the choice I was struggling with. Our existing trays circulate through another process, so using the dedicated version would add a transfer unless that process changed too.
21pointsPrice the transfer with the person stuck doing it.
8pointsAnd the tray supply and storage, Will; a demonstration tray does not establish how many usable trays arrive at the station or who replaces a damaged one during an order.
20pointsI would still ask both suppliers what their demonstrations left to the operator. The untidy-tray candidate might look more representative and still have someone rescuing awkward parts off camera.
13pointsAlex, fair point. Our tray doesn't automatically mean our actual work.
6pointsBoth suppliers have accepted a comparison using the same spacer order and our packer. One will show the dedicated-tray workflow, the other our circulating trays. Preparation, interruptions and the unfinished end of the order are included.
18pointsKeep the two scope descriptions visible when you compare the results, since a supported workflow change might be worthwhile but should not be mistaken for an arm winning the same task unaided.
3pointsHas the downstream process owner agreed to consider a tray change, or are you costing a transfer that everyone hopes will disappear later?
23pointsNo downstream change is agreed. The dedicated-tray option includes the manual transfer in our costing. Its supplier proposed removing that task later, but we have not used that suggestion as a saving.
6pointsThat's useful. We had an improvement described as temporary extra handling for so long that nobody owned removing it. Eventually it was simply part of the job, without ever appearing in the buying comparison.
25pointsThe completed comparison favours our circulating trays for this order. The dedicated tray gave smoother handling, but preparation and returning the spacers to our normal flow consumed the gain. Both supplied workflows have now been reviewed with the packer.
15pointsSo are you buying, or just dropping the dedicated-tray option?
7pointsDropping that workflow from this purchase comparison, not placing an order yet. The remaining candidate still needs its full commercial and integration review. Thank you Liam; treating the transfer as real work let us make a useful decision.
6pointsKeep the dedicated-tray figures available for a future downstream change, with today's transfer cost attached; the result may change if the work changes, but it should not change merely because someone reuses the smooth video.
12pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .