I loaded identified pucks as instructed, watched the transfer and checked the finished tray with the demonstrator. I did not select the tooling or teach the job, though my opening rather suggests I did.

I've read a trial account where the writer's first five minutes began after someone else's two hours of setup. Nobody had invented the five minutes, but the reader pictured an entirely different job. Yours can simply start at the prepared station and say what you learned there.

The useful part was learning to spot a puck sitting high before the transfer. The demonstrator pointed out the first one; I recognised the next example. That belongs in the account more than my quick-start boast.

Include that assistance with the example. It gives a reader a realistic picture of the lesson, and it does not erase the fact that you recognised the next case.

No. Changing it to my supervised FR10 puck-handling session. The opening will describe the prepared station and my actual part in the trial.

Keep the pleasure in it too. A useful lesson can be enjoyable without being evidence that you can install the whole cell. What surprised you about the high puck is the bit I'd read.

Has the revised account been posted with its captions checked? A caption saying setup completed can preserve the original claim under an otherwise corrected story.

Posted. Title and captions now match the supervised session; the high-puck example names the demonstrator's first prompt. Thank you, Alex, the preparation point gave me a much better opening than a general apology.

Good to hear. The actual lesson sounds worth sharing.