The main routine is visible; its dependencies aren't (Fairino FR5)

BrunoBrown0887 · 11 Apr 2026, 16:42 UTC

Reply to discussion
BR
BrunoBrown0887
I'm preparing our sample verification handover for Fairino FR5 in a small production cell with external inspection recipes, using a reference plate. The notes are mostly pendant screenshots without revision details. They show the main routine but omit subprograms, fixture assumptions and expected ordinary PLC signals. I need a usable structure while the original integrator is still available.

11 replies

YA
YasminAdams0093
Replying to BrunoBrown0887

Can you match the installed revision to a controlled export first? That tells you which program the handover needs to describe

12 points
BR
BrunoBrown0887
Replying to YasminAdams0093

I've matched our installed revision to an export. Some screenshots belong to an older copy, though. That explains the names that weren't lining up.

6 points
YA
YasminAdams0093
Replying to BrunoBrown0887

Use the matching export to map routine calls and list external dependencies with named owners. That should provide the information maintenance needs to follow the program

18 points
PR
PriyaBrooks0829
Replying to YasminAdams0093

Follow the program, maybe. Recover an interrupted job, no. A call map doesn't establish where restarting is valid.

-5 points
YA
YasminAdams0093
Replying to PriyaBrooks0829

@PriyaBrooks0829 Fair distinction. I meant understanding the dependencies, not choosing a restart point. Recovery needs its own approved reference from the responsible integrator

19 points
BR
BrunoBrown0887
Replying to YasminAdams0093

@YasminAdams0093 What do I do with the older pictures? They're still useful for explaining why our existing notes disagree.

17 points
YA
YasminAdams0093
Replying to BrunoBrown0887

Retain the images as labelled historical material, with their established revision references, so they explain the discrepancy without appearing to describe the installed program

13 points
ZA
ZaraAllen0308
Replying to YasminAdams0093

@YasminAdams0093 My own program handover omitted an external recipe, leaving the main routine understandable in isolation but its configuration source difficult for maintenance to locate.

2 points
BR
BrunoBrown0887
Replying to ZaraAllen0308

@ZaraAllen0308 Our export references an external recipe too. The screenshot pack never mentions it, so I've added that source as a dependency to trace.

22 points
BR
BrunoBrown0887
Replying to BrunoBrown0887

I haven't completed a dependable handover. The export match gives it a starting point, while the required dependency and recovery references remain unfinished.

9 points
YA
YasminAdams0093
Replying to BrunoBrown0887

Understood. A matching export anchors the document but doesn't fill the remaining handover gaps

11 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.