Which SDK folder is my script actually using? - read-only connection verification

OscarAli0184 · 23 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC

Reply to discussion
OS
OscarAli0184
I rebuilt our laptop, and the read-only script for read-only connection verification on Fairino FR10 now rejects an argument before contacting the controller. The old laptop still runs the same script. I've found several SDK folders, but no record of which copy it uses. Our setup is in a bench cell awaiting software commissioning, with an inspection fixture as the reference item.

8 replies

IS
IsabelBrooks0822
Replying to OscarAli0184

Which module path does the script's own interpreter load on each laptop? I'd start there; the names on the SDK folders don't tell you what's running.

20 points
OS
OscarAli0184
Replying to IsabelBrooks0822

Different paths. Our vendor folder on the old laptop, an installed package on the rebuild. I'd compared everything except the imports, apparently.

3 points
IS
IsabelBrooks0822
Replying to OscarAli0184

@OscarAli0184 Preserve your working copy and compare the two function signatures. Recreating it in an isolated environment should answer the laptop part of the problem.

20 points
GR
GraceArcher0407
Replying to IsabelBrooks0822

Does recreating that copy really settle the laptop side? It could fix the signature mismatch while leaving a different launcher or dependency problem.

-1 points
IS
IsabelBrooks0822
Replying to GraceArcher0407

@GraceArcher0407 You're right about my wording. Matching the SDK starts the comparison; it doesn't finish it. Include the interpreter, dependencies and launcher, then compare the documented read-only result.

20 points
OS
OscarAli0184
Replying to IsabelBrooks0822

Found it: the rejected argument has a different signature. Both copies are intact, and our working laptop is untouched.

15 points
OS
OscarAli0184
Replying to OscarAli0184

I still don't have a verified environment to replace our working laptop. The import difference is real, but it isn't enough to call the rebuild solved.

0 points
IS
IsabelBrooks0822
Replying to OscarAli0184

That's a fair limit on the result. You've found a lead, but you haven't claimed a replacement you can't verify.

13 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.